legalxml-sc — archive

Re: [legalxml-sc] FW: [members] Member Review--Draft revised IPR Policy

From: Daniel Greenwood
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:47:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















legalxml-sc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [legalxml-sc] FW: [members] Member Review--Draft revised IPR Policy




From: "Daniel Greenwood" <[email protected]>
To: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG-DAY)" <[email protected]>,"'John Greacen'" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:51:55 -0400






I got the document and am sending it as an attachment.  The language needs
to be evaluated closely, but at first glance, it seems as though the RF
license comports with the theme of the existing LegalXML required TC charter
language.  It looks pretty good, actually - but I reserve judgment until I
print, read, test against real and potential scenarios, and listen to
impressions and opinions of others.

Thanks,
 - Dan
PS: I'm not on the SC any longer, but offer these comments as a source of
some non-binding historical perspective.