legalxml-sc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-sc] Today's Meeting materials
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] Today's Meeting materials
- From: "Winters, Roger" <[email protected]>
- To: "John Messing" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:49:54 -0700
Hello, I want to note that the name of OASIS is "Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards." I, too, have used the word "Systems" in the last position, but that is incorrect. See http://www.oasis-open.org/who/. What I took as the gist of the letter is that it is an exhortation from a group that is working on e-Notarization standards for court and legal documents to the Secretaries of State urging that, in endorsing a method of signing that they understand (PKI), they should not inadvertently exclude other methods that exist now or that will emerge in the future. I presently don't have a problem with a LegalXML entity making this comment, if it is merely input invited pursuant to a public meeting, but I'm not sure it should be the Steering Committee that makes the comment. The chair/co-chairs of the eNotarization TC would, I think, be appropriate communicators, saying essentially that they're exploring other things that are believed to be as good or better than the PKI approach to e-Signatures. The letter might convey a stronger sense of "we're on the same side as you, trying to find methods for e-Notarization that we can recommend to our constituencies." Would it be wiser to emphasize the criteria that must be met to make a given methodology/technology acceptable for notarization purposes? Then they might say they believe PKI meets those criteria today, but other approaches may also do so, now or in the future. I hope these comments are helpful. Roger Winters Program and Project Manager and Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Coordinator King County Department of Judicial Administration 516 Third Avenue, E-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609 Seattle, Washington 98104 V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906 [email protected]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]