legalxml-sc — archive

LegalXML RoP

From: Robert O'Brien <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:06:00 -0000

Yes I agree too George. Thanks Dee for catching that. At the time I was reviewing the RoP, I guess I was thinking George was at large too. Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:44 -0700 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [legalxml-sc] LegalXML RoP Hi Dee, The SC reviewed the ROP a couple of months ago and didn't find any other changes we needed to make. So, I think we would agree with the change you are suggesting is the only one needed. I'm on board with it. Robert? Monica? Your thoughts? George On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Dee Schur < [email protected] > wrote: Hi all, Now, that we have the election behind us we need to deal with a problem in the language of the LegalXML RoP. Scott and I know of one change for the LegalXML RoP that needs to address the lower number of StC members. The current sentence is ? Three or four additional At Large Steering Committee members shall be elected by the Qualified Electors of the OASIS LegalXML Member Section.? We currently have two ?at-large? StC members. I would like to remove a specific number, something like: ?In order to maintain an odd number status of the Steering Committee, At Large Steering Committee members shall be elected by the Qualified Electors of the OASIS LegalXML Member Section yearly.? But the StC will need to create the language to deal with this discrepancy. Please review the RoP carefully, http://www.legalxml.org/governance/rules_of_procedures.shtml , and see if there are other changes too ? we need to deal with them at one time. Let me know if you have questions or concerns. Best, Dee Dee Schur, Senior Manager - Standards Advocate OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org -- George W. Knecht PC Intellect LLC 602.380.8049