[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (MQTT-169) 1.2 Normative and 1.3 Non Normative RFC references incorrect format (11) cases
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Richard Coppen updated MQTT-169:
--------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 3.1.1
Component/s: edits
We should use Patrick's table
> 1.2 Normative and 1.3 Non Normative RFC references incorrect format (11) cases
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MQTT-169
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-169
> Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: edits
> Affects Versions: 3.1.1
> Environment: References
> Reporter: Patrick Durusau
> Priority: Minor
>
> The references to:
> RFC1928
> RFC2119
> RFC3546
> RFC3629
> RFC4511
> RFC5077
> RFC5246
> RFC5280
> RFC6455
> RFC6749
> RFC6960
> are incorrect when compared to the canonical source for RFC citations maintained by the RFC Editor: http://www.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-ref.txt
> This is made more puzzling because there is one correct RFC reference to RFC793, which isn't commonly cited.
> In any event, it helps with indexing and searching if the official RFC citations are used as declared by the IETF.
> BTW, I maintain a formatted listing of the current RFCs (does not include superseded RFCs) at: http://www.durusau.net/standards/rfc/current/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]