[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-474) If the packet has a zero length Topic Name field ...which Reason Code is appropriate?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=66657#comment-66657 ]
Ken Borgendale commented on MQTT-474:
-------------------------------------
The original discussion of 0x94 (Topic Alias invalid) is that it is outside of the valid range (>Maximum Topic Alias) and it is so documented.
I do not see any requirement for this change.
> If the packet has a zero length Topic Name field ...which Reason Code is appropriate?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MQTT-474
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-474
> Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 5, wd14
> Reporter: Konstantin Dotchkoff
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5, wd14
>
>
> This issue was originally reported in MQTT-417.
> Line 2037-2039
> "3) If the receiver does not already have a mapping for this Topic Alias
> a) If the packet has a zero length Topic Name field it is a Protocol Error and the receiver uses DISCONNECT with Reason Code of 0x82 (Protocol Error) as described in section 4.13."
> Why not use Return Code of 0x94 Topic Alias invalid?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]