[OASIS Issue Tracker] (MQTT-514) Still, the conformance clauses are some of the most decent in MQTT5 compared to many specs!

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ken Borgendale updated MQTT-514:
--------------------------------

    Description: 
TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand

In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the functional definition of conformance targets.). Good job to MQTT editors!

  was:
TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand

In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the 


> Still, the conformance clauses are some of the most decent in MQTT5 compared to many specs!
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MQTT-514
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/MQTT-514
>             Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: edits
>    Affects Versions: 5, CSD01
>            Reporter: Ken Borgendale
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: TAB
>
> TAB-1564 - Jacques Durand
> In spite of all my previous comments on COnformance, the conformance section in this specification is fairly decent ! The conf section job is greatly facilitated by the well worded normative statements with clear assignment to the conformance targets. All my previous comments were tagged "minor" (I think) - they are not critical and should not warrant by themselves a new review cycle. But should be fixed if an opportunity shows up. Several (and maybe all?) could fall under editorial - non material - changes (e.g. the one about renaming "Conformance clause" section and bringing up the functional definition of conformance targets.). Good job to MQTT editors!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)