[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OBIX-223) Section 5 versioning requirements violate SHOULD rules about Extent in Section 9.3
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59378#comment-59378 ]
Craig Gemmill commented on OBIX-223:
-------------------------------------
How important is the version/retrieval information? Discussion topic.
> Section 5 versioning requirements violate SHOULD rules about Extent in Section 9.3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OBIX-223
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-223
> Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
> Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 WD39
> Reporter: Craig Gemmill
> Assignee: Craig Gemmill
>
> The requirement to put the version and/or retrieval time in as a child element sort of violates the rule about Extent in 9.3, which is that you only use non-refs for primitive children with no further extent; complex children should generally be represented with refs. Conceptually I think it’s helpful not to have to ask again for these additional details, but it is the first place a client looks, and it violates the rule. The ‘rule’ is a should, not a must, so it’s not a definite problem, but still worth noting and considering.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]