[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OBIX-241) Definition of Contract List; ContractList seems a typographic error

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59390#comment-59390 ] 

Craig Gemmill  commented on OBIX-241:
-------------------------------------

There is a definition of Contract List right before 7.2.  Does this not answer all of the questions posed here?  I will wait for reply or TC discussion before closing this...

> Definition of Contract List; ContractList seems a typographic error
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OBIX-241
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OBIX-241
>             Project: OASIS Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: OBIX 1.1 Specification
>    Affects Versions: OBIX 1.1 WD39
>         Environment: William Cox
>            Reporter: William Cox
>            Assignee: Craig Gemmill 
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Line 1132 "An Object's Contract List may specify multiple Contract URIs to implement". Suggests that there are 1..* Contract URIs in a list.
> Can there be zero? Is an empty string (Nil or Null) OK?
> Line 1027 (Section 7.2): a list of URI references...
> Suggests again that a Contract a single URI reference,and a Contract list has 1..* Contracts.
> Is a Nil list (as in the initialization for Op::in Figure 4-1 that empty list? So a Contract List can have 0..* elements? 
> Contract seems conflated with Contract List in Figure 4-1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)