office-collab — archive

Compromise on change-tracking proposals

From: Robin LaFontaine <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:38:00 -0000

Svante, I have read through your compromise solution, and I find it hard to understand this as a compromise, but it is certainly interesting as a new proposal. As you know, we are out of time to consider completely new approaches, unless we are directed to do so by the TC. This was mentioned briefly in the TC call today, and there is no direction from them to change our course at the moment. However, your comments on the other proposals from your perspective of needing to implement a collaboration method, are very relevant and useful. I have read through your proposal in detail, and also the references that you have previously provided. I have also had some discussions with you to better understand the methodology. I know you still have a lot of work to do to develop this. Please keep us informed, as you develop your approach, on how your work might influence our choice of approach for change tracking. Robin On 20/08/2011 23:43, Svante Schubert wrote: Dear SC, After a thorough analysis of the ongoing discussion regarding change-tracking (CT), I would like to suggest a compromise between the two existing proposals. ..snip If you have any question or comments on the above, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Svante -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Robin La Fontaine, Director, DeltaXML Ltd Change control for XML T: +44 1684 592 144 E: [email protected] http://www.deltaxml.com Registered in England 02528681 Reg. Office: Monsell House, WR8 0QN, UK