office-collab — archive

WD04 comments [3 Thorsten]

From: Robin LaFontaine <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:02:00 -0000

On 11/01/2012 16:31, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 09:24 -0700, [email protected] wrote: I don't think anyone suggested that they would tell us what to do . If you look back at the comments received during previous public reviews, say with ODF 1.2, you'll see that we received a lot of useful feedback, including from SC34 members. Not all stakeholders are on the TC, so there is value in engaging via the public review process. I think there is a big difference between (1) us saying This is a specification we would like to propose. and to get feedback on it and (2) us saying We don't like either of these two proposals as they are but what do you think? Andreas or perhaps: (3) These two proposals have thrown up a number of fundamental issues regarding trade-offs in different approaches to change tracking. We are seeking your views on these issues so that we can make a more informed decision on the best way forward. Robin -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Robin La Fontaine, Director, DeltaXML Ltd Experts in information change T: +44 1684 592 144 E: [email protected] http://www.deltaxml.com Registered in England 02528681 Reg. Office: Monsell House, WR8 0QN, UK