[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-270) Public Comment:Meaning of 'should'

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11838#action_11838 ] 

Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-270:
----------------------------------------

This is Public Comment Registry #17

The discussion of "SHOULD" and "should" and [RFC2119] in this comment applies only to ODF 1.0.

ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2 use "*should*" (bold-face) and [ISO/IEC DIrectives].  There do continue to be "should" (not bold-face) appearances as well, and it is not clear what their standing is with regard to normative language.

> Public Comment: Meaning of 'should'
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-270
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-270
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: comment-form@oasis-open.org 
> Original date: 20 Oct 2005 20:37:34 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200510/msg00031.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira