[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2789) 19.275 "The filteris conjunctively added..." ? How is "conjunctively added" different from"added?"

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19982#action_19982 ] 

Andreas Guelzow  commented on OFFICE-2789:
------------------------------------------

If you have an existing filter and add a second one you could have two possibilities, the conditions could be connected via a disjunction (first condition holds _or_ second condition holds) or via a conjunction (first condition holds _and_ second condition holds). Using the term "conjunctively added" is intended to make sure that the second version of "added" is used.

I think that the proposal would raise the question whether a conjuction or a disjunction should be used. (Note that in w=either case we have 2 filters so the term "added" by itself does not imply "conjunction".)

> 19.275 "The filter is conjunctively added..." ? How is "conjunctively added" different from "added?"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2789
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2789
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05
>            Reporter: Patrick Durusau
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06
>
>
> 19.275 "The filter is conjunctively added..." ? How is "conjunctively added" different from "added?"

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira