[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-3931) Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time
Regina Henschel created OFFICE-3931:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time
Key: OFFICE-3931
URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3931
Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Presentation
Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
Reporter: Regina Henschel
Priority: Minor
Fix For: ODF 1.3
As described in issue 3930, the first sentence needs to be corrected.
But in addition I have noticed this:
In date-time case the wording is
"false: drawing shape from a <style:master-page> element with the presentation class date-time should not be visible."
whereas for footer, header and page-number cases it is
"false: drawing shape used as a *** of a <style:master-page> element should not be visible.
That is inconsistent.
ODF 1.1 is more explicit about the condition by referring to the presentation:class attribute (now 19.389). In ODF 1.1 you read e.g.
"The presentation:display-date-time attribute sets the visibility of presentation shapes from the master page with the presentation class date-time."
Any reason for mentioning presentation:class in case date-time and not in the other cases?
Should we remove the inconsistency in addition to correcting the broken sentence?
If yes, remove reference to presentation:class from date-time case, or add reference to presentation:class for the other cases?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]