[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4088) "implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

Regina Henschel created OFFICE-4088:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: "implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"
                 Key: OFFICE-4088
                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4088
             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Regina Henschel


Section 1.2 Terminology in Part 2, ODF 1.3, defines the term "implementation-defined". But I find it as "implementation defined" (without dash) in

4.16.11Â manifest:preferred-view-mode, part 2

4.17 manifest:PGPAlgorithm, part 2

3.4 Host-Defined Behaviors, part 4

In addition, 4.17 has wrong character style in that sentence.


Having both, makes a search for "implementation-defined" terms unnecessary difficult. So in case not the defined term "implementation-defined" is intended, the wording should be changed to avoid "implementation defined".

I think, that it should be with dash in 4.17 and consider that as editorial error.

I'm not sure about the other cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)