pkcs11 — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Proposal: CKM_SHA512_224, CKM_SHA512_256, CKM_SHA512_T
On 8/6/2013 2:44 PM, Dina Kurktchi wrote: "SHA-512/t" is the name of the digest method as described in section 5.3.6 of FIPS 180-4.
By calling it by its name, I thought it would be clear which digest method I meant.
I see how it can be mistaken for "Truncated message digests" in section 7.
Yes, stating the CKM_SHA512_224 and CKM_SHA512_256 are special cases of CKM_SHA512_T is no problem.
It may even be useful to rewrite this as one section instead of three, and make CKM_SHA512_224 and CKM_SHA512_256 subsections of the main one.
Can I leave that to the doc editors, or do I need to do this myself?
Let's address this on the call.
I don't have a big problem with updating and clarifying references being considered "editorial" changes, but others might.
Mike
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]