[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pki-lowercosts] Contractor costing
David, I agree with your plan to get quotes from a few qualified and available consultants. You might want to talk to Stephen Wilson for one. Thanks, Steve Skyberg, David wrote: > Hi Ross, > > In response to your question—we agreed a couple of months ago that none > of the current members of this sub committee have the time to actually > perform on any of these task, and that we need to hire a contractor to > get this done. So, the work of this sub committee begins with > identifying the contractor tasks and then getting bids on the work. > Thus, the contractor cost. > > > > Now on to the next topic. We need to get some bids on this. Does > anyone have an idea of where to send this? I know Arshad had offered to > take a stab at estimating the cost. But that was to support providing > feedback into the Membership Section budgeting process. I think it’s a > waste of time at this point and that we should give this directly to a > couple of folks that can perform on it. Then as a committee, we can > select the candidate we want to go with, take the bid to the steering > committee for funding, and get this work turned on. > > > > Hi Steve, > > You originally had an action item to dig up a sample funding document so > that I could prepare the funding request. Personally, given how we are > currently handling these sorts of things in the steering committee, I > don’t think that is necessary. I suggest we simply take the proposals > we get from the contractor(s) and use that as the basis for our funding > request. Comments? > > > > OK folks, we’re almost there! All we need now is a contractor! > > > > =david > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Ross Smith [mailto:Ross.Smith@pwgsc.gc.ca] > *Sent:* Monday, November 01, 2004 8:05 PM > *To:* Skyberg, David; PKI Lower Costs > *Subject:* RE: [pki-lowercosts] Contractor costing > > > > David - I think it looks fine. We are all going to have to find the > time to provide input into the survey. > > > > I am curious about the subject line "Contractor Costing". > > > > Ross > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Skyberg, David [mailto:dskyberg@rsasecurity.com] > *Sent:* Monday, November 01, 2004 9:51 AM > *To:* PKI Lower Costs > *Subject:* [pki-lowercosts] Contractor costing > > Hi folks, > > We really need to close on this issue soon. At our current rate, I > don’t see us doing much of anything for the remainder of the year. > We really need to pick up the pace! Here is the list of tasks that > we have outlined. Let’s please all take a moment and flesh these > out so that we have what we believe to be a complete set of tasks. > If you don’t have any input for this, then please signal your > acceptance by emailing as such to the group. > > > > > > Draft the survey > > Work with the sub committee members to draft a survey. The sub > committee will approve the survey before the survey is conducted. > > - Survey Phase 1 > > TC members will be the target of the first phase. The contractor > will conduct the survey with all willing TC members. > > - Phase 1 analysis > > The contractor will provide analysis of the survey results and > coordinate feedback from the TC on the survey itself. > > - Refine the Survey > > The contractor will edit and refine the survey based on the feedback > from the TC, the analysis of the phase 1 results, and guidance from > the sub committee. > > - Identify second phase targets > > The contractor will coordinate input from the TC as to likely > candidates for the second phase survey. The subcommittee will > approve the final list. > > - Survey Phase 2 > > The contractor will conduct the survey with representative on both > the consumer and producer side of the PKI industry. > > - Report analysis of results > > The contractor will report analysis of the results to the sub > committee in a format suitable for reporting to both the TC as well > as the public > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]