Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Joe,

We're still in agreement on this - its the "how to" that is
the devil in the details ; -)

I see two schools emerging - 

a) What Diego has built - which is great for drawing diagrams
     of maps of things - and consists of XML fragments that
     chain together like a net map with pointers.  Seems to 
     me this is what the CCTS are hot to have (although the
     Finnish is tough to read!)

b) CRI approach - which is a set of semantics about each
     node in the map in a) above - and aimed at capturing
      much more details at implementation level - and 
      facilitates the assembly of payloads and their 
      management.

Thanks, DW.
=================================================
Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
>
I think we're going in circles here between early 2003 and now. Back
around February, we had a long string of discussions in which all agreed
that the best approach was an XML serialization (you were one of the
main proponents of that approach). Have you changed your perspective?
How are registry users going to assemble schemas from Core Components if
they are not stored and maintained in XML format? 
<