RE: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS

[Diego Ballv� <diego.ballve@republica.fi>]

Attached is what could be the "ObjectTypes for CCTS" extension,
using rim/rs 2.1. I think it is aligned with our talks.
It is not under ExtrinsicObject, though it would be quite easy to
change, if that is desirable. 
Also, 1 more level can be added to separate what is now separated
only by comments in the xml file.

Diego

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:farrukh.najmi@sun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: CCRev
Subject: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS


Chiusano Joseph wrote:

><JMC>
>Our most recent discussions have been: A Core Component is either a
>Basic Core Component (BCC) or Aggregate Core Component (ACC). Therefore,
>not only are Aggregate Core Components a particular category of Core
>Components, but Basic Core Components are as well. 
>
>There is no special registry treatment for this requirement - it is
>explanatory.
></JMC>
>
>  
>
Apologies for being out of touch of late. I hope the following is not an 
off the wall suggestion or already been discussed.

Should there not be an extension to the ObjectType scheme defined for 
CCTS mapping? Such a extension would have a tree somthing like this:

                                                                         
           |-------------BasicCoreComponent
ExtrinsicObject---------CoreComponent----------------|
                                                                                    
|-------------AggregateCoreComponent


Such a tree should be rooted under ExtrintrinsicObject.

BTW Nikola and I have discussed that the canonical ObjectType scheme in 
2.5 is not right. We think it should be simplified so


-The only child of ObjectType should be RegistryObject and the current 
tree under that node

-all other non RIM types such as user defined ObjectTypes are 
descendents of ExtrinsicObject

This provides for a better model where for example a CoreComponent IS A 
ExtrinsicObject. This is more natural.

Thoughts?

-- 
Farrukh



You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php

SubmitObjectsRequest_CCConcepts_1.xml