[relax-ng] Default content for attributes in the compact syntax

[Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>]

Sorry if this has already been covered, but I have noticed that there is 
no default child content pattern for attribute in the compact syntax.

In other words,

<attribute name="foo"/> is legal and transformed during the 
simplification process into 
<attribute><name>foo</name><text/></attribute> while in the compact 
syntax, "attribute foo {}" is invalid.

I guess that this is needed to insure syntactical coherence in the 
compact syntax, but is it normal|wishable to introduce differences 
between the two syntaxes and doesn't it affect round triping?

Thanks

Eric
-- 
See you in San Diego.
                                http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------