Re: [sca-j] package names

[Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com>]

Bryan,
There has only been brief mention that such a change might be needed or 
desirable.  There is no sca-j issue open for this.  It is potentially 
related (but not tied) to what decisions are made about XML namespaces. My 
own view is that we should not change the package names unless the sca-j 
TC changes the APIs in an incompatible way.

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999



Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> 
13/12/2007 17:11

To
sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc

Subject
[sca-j] package names







I know that this is a minor thing, but has there been any discussion about 
needing to change the package names from org.osoa.sca... to something else 
- potentially org.oasis.sca... or org.oasis-open.sca...? 

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU