[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics ofan Unannotated Implementation
Simon,
Should the introduction of @Local annotation affect the "Semantics of an
Unannotated Implementation" (section 8 in sca-javaci-draft-20070926.doc)
where we are currently using only interfaces marked with @Remotable in
computing the references/properties of an implementation?
++Vamsi
Simon Nash
<NASH@uk.ibm.com>
To
27/08/2008 12:57 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] Introspecting services
offered by a Java implementation
class without @Service
Raymond,
Minor nit: the @OneWay annotation applies to a method, not to an
interface. �Your example should be updated to show this.
In your example, these services are local. �Issue JAVA-3 has proposed a new
annotation @Local that could be used on Interface1and Interface2 to allow
them to be recognized by the introspection algorithm.
I believe this discussion can be handled under JAVA-3 and there is no need
to create a new issue.
� � Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 �Fax +44-1962-818999
Raymond Feng
<rfeng@us.ibm.com>
To
25/08/2008 17:25 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[sca-j] Introspecting
services offered by a Java
implementation class without
@Service
Hi,
In Java Component Implementation Specification 1.00, we have the following
statements:
143 1.2.1.3. Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation
144 In the cases described below, the services offered by a Java
implementation class may be determined
145 through introspection, eliding the need to specify them using @Service.
The following algorithm is used to
146 determine how services are introspected from an implementation class:
147 If the interfaces of the SCA services are not specified with the
@Service annotation on the implementation
148 class, it is assumed that all implemented interfaces that have been
annotated as @Remotable are the
149 service interfaces provided by the component. If none of the
implemented interfaces is remotable, then by
150 default the implementation offers a single service whose type is the
implementation class.
What if an interface is annotated with SCA annotations such as @OneWay or
@Callback?
For example:
public class MyServiceImpl implements Interface1, Interface2 {
}
@Callback(CallbackInterface.class)
public interface Interface1 {
}
@OneWay
public interface Interface2 {
}
By the spec, there is only one service named MyServiceImpl. But isn't it
more natural that we should find two SCA services: Interface1 and
Interface2? Please clarify.
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond Feng
Senior Software Engineer, Open Source SCA Development, Apache Tuscany
Project
IBM Bay Area Lab, 1001 E Hillsdale Blvd, Suite 400, Foster City, CA 94404,
USA
E-mail: rfeng@us.ibm.com, Notes: Raymond Feng/Burlingame/IBM, Tel:
650-645-8117, T/L: 367-8117
Web & Blog: www.enjoyjava.com - The Cyber Cafeteria to Enjoy Java
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]