[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SCAJ-2) Need to define the derivation of the name of a component contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCAJ-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=29562#action_29562 ] 

Anish Karmarkar commented on SCAJ-2:
------------------------------------

This is OSOA JIRA issue 91.

Original email at:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200811/msg00007.html

Opened Nov 3

re-opened Aug 21 telecon


> Need to define the derivation of the name of a component contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCAJ-2
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCAJ-2
>             Project: OASIS Service Component Architecture / J (SCA-J) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java EE Integration Specification 
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Anish Karmarkar
>
> Raiser: Mike Edwards
> Target: sca-jee-1[1][1].1-spec-wd04.doc
> Description:
> Section 5.1.3 describes the use of an application.composite file within a Java EE contribution.
> This section indicates that the use of an application.composite file means the "automagical" deployment
> of a component into the Domain, but the section does not describe what the component's name is or
> how it is derived. The component name is essential if any SCA wiring is used at the Domain level.
> Proposal:
> None

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira