Re: Ballot Attached - Group 3: Sessions

[Evan Prodromou <evan@outlook.net>]

>>>>> "EP" == Evan Prodromou <evan@outlook.net> writes:

    JH> rationale: I believe this is subsummed within the topic of
    JH> [UC-3-1:UserSession] and we should deal with it explicitly in
    JH> that context.

    EP> So, I'm kind of confused by this rationale.

Actually, on review, I've noticed that it was actually David's idea to
remove these requirements. I still don't understand why, but I see I
was directing my questions at the wrong person.

David: why? B-) I find this even more puzzling, because those were
req'ts pulled out of ITML and posted to this list. Was there a reason
you didn't want the explicit logout, timeout, etc. requirements?

~ESP