Hal's BALLOT for GROUPS 6, 7, 8, 9

[Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>]

BALLOT
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All issue resolutions are mutually exclusive, so please choose one
option for each issue.

[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol] 

2. Leave current binding to SOAP.

It seems we need to do SOAP now and consider other similiar protocols as
they are defined.

[UC-7-01:Enveloping]

   2. Do not add this proposed requirement.

[UC-7-02:Enveloped]

   2. Do not add this proposed requirement.

It is not clear to me that all requirements cannot be me with detached
signatures. I may be wrong about this, however I think this is a design
decision. Therefore I do not think we need these as requirements, even
though the specifcations may include them.

[UC-8-01:Intermediaries]

   1. Add proposed requirement [CR-8-01:Intermediaries].

[UC-8-02:IntermediaryAdd]

   1. Add the given use-case scenario to the document.

[UC-8-03:IntermediaryDelete]

   1. Add the given use-case scenario to the document.

[UC-8-04:IntermediaryEdit]

   2. Don't add this use-case scenario.

[UC-8-05:AtomicAssertion]

   1. Add the non-goal [CR-8-05:AtomicAssertion] to the document, and
      change use case scenarios to specify that intermediaries must
      treat assertions as atomic.

[UC-9-01:RuntimePrivacy]

   1. Add the proposed non-goal [CR-9-01:RuntimePrivacy].

[UC-9-02:PrivacyStatement]

   4. Add none of these as requirements.