tgf — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Draft deliverable 1 - the TGF Core Framework
Title: RE: [tgf] Draft deliverable 1 - the TGF Core Framework Hi, I may only be able to initiate tomorrow ’ s working session conference cal l but have had a chance to rea d Peter ’ s documents and attach some comments :- 1. Core Framework (added to John ’ s comments ( with which I agr ee) – I suggest that we need more emphasis on businesses being customers and the use of modern technologies to foster partnership working with customers and interest groups outside government <<20110203 - Outline Draft - 1 - TGF Core Framework+JB + NG comments.doc>> 2. Business Management Framework. I have added my original ‘ stakeholder ’ model in at the point that I feel is appropriate <<20110203 - Outline Draft - 2 - Business Management Framework + NG Comments.doc>> 3. Customer Management Framework . I think we need to review the status of the Concentrix model and any alternatives that would satisfy our requirements. <<20110203 - Outline Draft - 3 - Customer Management Framework + NG Comments.doc>> 4. Channel Management Framework . I suggest that we need to promote a mixed economy of government and other organisations. <<20110203 - Outline Draft - 4 - Channel Management Framework + NG Comments.doc>> 5. Business Management Framework. I suggest that we consider the CSTranform G overnance M aturity M odel for inclusion in this paper Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637
Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. Regards Nig Nig Greenaway Government Division FUJITSU SERVICES Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637
Internal: 7302 5637 Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confiden ce and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free.
From: John Borras [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: 01 February 2011 11:36
To: [email protected]; 'TGF TC List '
Subject: RE: [tgf] Draft deliverable 1 - the TGF Core Framework Peter Thanks for this and the other sections you ’ ve posted. A few initial thoughts in attached but as you say we need to agree on the overall structure and flow first before we get to detailed content. I tend to agree with Colin that the demarcation between overview/scope and the Framework standard bit is not ver y clear. Not a big editing job, just needs some word smithing to make the distinction clear. For discussion on Friday. John
From: Peter F Brown [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: 01 February 2011 01:56
To: TGF TC List
Subject: [tgf] Draft deliverabl e 1 - the TGF Core Framework Hi: In line with the proposals that I made last week, I have submitted to our document repository a first, very rough and ready draft of what would be the first main standards-track deliverable, the ‘ TGF Core Framework ’ : http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tgf/document.php?document_id=40965 I ’ ve screen scraped from the CS Transform contributions and used various bits that h ave also been worked on. The detail isn ’ t important at this stage (and as editors, Chris and I will obviously take care to endure the text is fully coherent), just the overall structure and flow. I ’ ll do the same for the next three – which should be easie r as they are more or less straight lifts from the business management, customer management and channel management sections of the contributions we have. I ’ ll submit them asap. As for the four ‘ non-standards track ’ Committee Notes, - we don ’ t yet have any s ubstantive content for the one on SOA; - the one on “tools and models for the business management framework” will include material we have on the milestones matrix, the stakeholders map, and the policy map - the ones on “tools and models for the customer manag ement framework” and “tools and models for the channel management framework” are fairly bare at the moment – we will have to judge how much goes in the respective ‘ frameworks ’ and how much needs to be left to a non-standards track paper Regards, Peter Pe ter F Brown Independent Consultant Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies Web www.peterfbrown.com Blog pensivepeter.wordpress.com LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/pensivepeter Twitter @pensivepeter P.O. Box 49 719, Los
Angeles, CA 90049, USA
Tel: +1.310.694.2278 20110203 - Outline Draft - 1 - TGF Core Framework+JB + NG comments.doc 20110203 - Outline Draft - 2 - Business Management Framework + NG Comments.doc 20110203 - Outline Draft - 3 - Customer Management Framework + NG Comments.doc 20110203 - Outline Draft - 4 - Channel Management Framework + NG Comments.doc
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]