ubl-jplsc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl-jplsc] Re: [ubl-l10n] Preparing the UBL 2.0 International Data Dictionary
Dear Jon Bosak,
I understand what you said.
We (UBL JPLSC) would like to start to revise Japanese translation of UBL
2.0.
You said followings at your e-mail posted on May 19, 2008
-----
To begin the work of revision, Roberto Cisternino of the ITLSC
will prepare updated versions of your current translations. These
revised spreadsheets will contain all of the corrections to
Dictionary Entry Names (DENs) and English definitions made in the
Update Package, and they will also highlight the translated
definitions that must be revised by the LSCs.
-----
We will expect the correction version (UBL 2.0 which has highlight to be
revised) will be made and be submitted to us (UBL JPLSC).
I have another question.
What is the exact version number of UBL 2.0 Update Package?
The file name of all of spreadsheets in UBL 2.0 Update Package is "2.0", for
example: UBL-CommonLibrary-2.0. In case of IDD libraries, there is title in
the top of spreadsheets. for example: UBL CommonLibrary 2.0.
There is no difference in file names and title of spreadsheets between the
first UBL 2.0 and UBL 2.0 Update Package. Is this OK? I think this is
troublesome, because we cannot distinguish the update version spreadsheets
only by the file name or title of spreadsheets. I think the version number
of update UBL 2.0 should be changed to distinguish the first UBL 2.0. For
example, the update UBL 2.0 would change to UBL 2.01.
Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito
.
-----------------------------------------
Yukinori Saito
ERP Research Corporation
e-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +81-3-3432-1656
Fax: +81-3-5405-1302
-----------------------------------------
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]