ubl-jplsc — archive

Re: [ubl-l10n] UBL 2.0 Errata 01 IDD rev. 2

From: Jon Bosak <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:47:00 -0000

Roberto, I agree with your procedure. Jon Roberto Cisternino wrote: > Dear Yukinori Saito, > the highlighted backgrounds have been generated automatically by a > procedure, and the two items you have reported have been considered > different due to additional [carriage return] + [line feed] (CR+LF) > characters in the end of the text. > > After translations have been completed and revised I expect we restore the > original background for the highlighted cells. (the original background > can be derived by other columns on the same row) > > Into my final italian IDD localization I restored all original backgrounds > for the highlighted cells I revised. > > I please ask Jon Bosak to confirm this practice. > > Best Regards, > > Roberto > >> Dear Roberto Cisternino, >> Thank you very much for your new IDD spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 Errata 01 IDD >> rev.2) including all fixes from the UBL 2.0 Errata 01. >> I have confirmed new correction parts which are highlighted using a green >> background. >> The followings are comments regarding new IDD spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 Errata >> 01 IDD rev.2) >> - The yellow color (revision mark) of No.1 BIE "BillOfLading" of the >> business document "Bill Of Lading" should be deleted. Because, this >> definition is not changed at all. >> - The yellow color (revision mark) of No.122 BIE "SubstitutionStatusCode" >> of >> the business document "qDT" should be deleted. Because, this definition is >> not changed at all. >> >> Best Regards, >> Yukinori Saito (Vice Chair of UBL JPLSC) >> ----------------------------------------- >> Yukinori Saito >> ERP Research Corporation >> e-mail: [email protected] >> Tel: +81-3-3432-1656 Fax: +81-3-5405-1302 >> ----------------------------------------- >> >>