ubl-ndrsc — archive

[Eve Maler]

All of this work is done by "just us chickens", so I don't want to stand on ceremony too much. I agree that it's a good idea to ensure that the context work get general agreement by the full NDR group, but I would have assumed that to be a good idea anyway, even for the stuff that's uncontroversially 100% in the CMSC bailiwick anyway. Let's definitely consider the December 19 meeting a joint SC meeting, but we've only got 60 minutes, so let's be careful how we spend it. Eve At 10:14 AM 12/6/01 -0800, Gregory, Arofan wrote: >Matt: > >I'm a little concerned that we get concensus from the design team on this, >since it drives so many other decisions about modularity, which features >of schema are to be used, namespaces & versioning, etc. I think we have >too many teams working on the same thing at the same time to be splitting >work up in an uncoordinated fashion, so we need to be really careful to >stay aligned, even with the overlap in membership. Perhaps after the >discussion next week - assuming we get agreement within the design team - >we could then pass it off, but I do think we want to be careful about this. -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com