ubl-ndrsc — archive

[Eve Maler]

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->




















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements




From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
To: Mavis Cournane <mavis.cournane@cognitran.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:07:14 -0400






Mavis Cournane wrote:
> Eve
> I think I would be lean towards keeping the "(parsers)" in brackets. It makes 
> it clearer and we have to cater for the lowest common denominator.

Okay.

> If I am going to normalize our rules I want to understand if we are making just 
> a recommendation here or are we going to make a rule of it and say "At a 
> minimum for UBL compliance, all encdoing declarations must be provided in the 
> XML declarations of UBL documents".

I don't know if a MUST would be very testable; I'm happy with using a 
SHOULD in keeping with the XML Recommendation...

	Eve

-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                     NEW!!! cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards               eve.maler @ sun.com









References:

[ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements
From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements
From: Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>
Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements
From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements
From: Mavis Cournane <mavis.cournane@cognitran.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC