ubl-ndrsc — archive

[Karl Best]

Note that it is now required that Committee Specs submitted to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS Standard must be formatted in the OASIS-approved templates mentioned by Eve. (See item #1 of http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.shtml#approval_standard ) -Karl Eve L. Maler wrote: > Check out this OASIS site: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/ > > You'll find DocBook tools there... > > Tim McGrath wrote: > >> this is something that should apply to all UBL documentation for >> public consumption.. maybe this is a task for 'tools and techniques' >> - to evaulate docbook and recommend ways (and some tools with which) >> we can use it. >> >> We are starting to think about UBL 1p00 as an OASIS spec so we should >> be planning this format now. >> >> well volunteered Gunther! >> >> >> >> Stuhec, Gunther wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Matthew MacKenzie recommends the ebXML Messaging group to be begin >>> using docbook. I guess, we should do the same for our representation >>> of documentation and descriptions. Matthew told that Norman Walsh has >>> put together a package to help OASIS spec authors to use docbook. And >>> Matthew used that for a proposal for the RegRep group. I might be a >>> good idea to look into this package, too. What do you think about it. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Gunther >>> >>>