ubl-ndrsc — archive

[bill burcham]

Title: Message In section 5.1, the term Namespace schema module is defined, and it looks like we want to use that new term to replace RootSchema (which is not defined) .  The section goes on to use the latter term (RootSchema) a lot unfortunately.  If we really want to replace the term, then please eliminate it everywhere.  The diagram on page 21 also still uses the term RootSchema . I have no feelings about which term is best.  If we look at the diagram, there are (were) two kinds of SchemaModule -- Internal Modules and Root Schemas.  Maybe we should adopt the term External Module -- to connote its external visibility and to contrast it with internal schema modules which are not visible to the outside world. I'll be happy to change the diagram to whatever the group decides.  I suggest these terms: Schema Module Internal Schema Module External Schema Module (so under my proposal, both RootSchema and Namespace Schema Module would go away)