ubl-ndrsc — archive

[Eduardo Gutentag]

I'll take the risk of answering for Arofan, since who knows when he'll respond, given recent history ;-) What Arofan proposes is to duplicate the envelope inside the document, plain and simple. No only is the UBL document just added to the envelope, as you say, but the envelope is also added to the document. On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 08:49, Burcham, Bill wrote: > There is an implicit premise here Arofan: that some _action_ is > necessary on the part of the UBL design team in order to "support" > generic headers. That's where I lose the trail. Isn't it true that > if someone wants to define some "generic envelope" in XML that they > can just do that and that and any old UBL document can just be added > as an element inside that envelope? Same for any XML-based document > standard right? Envelopes go on the _outside_ right? > > -Bill >