RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema

["Burcham, Bill" <Bill_Burcham@stercomm.com>]

I think we should remove this rule.  A user can filter out annotations if
they are unwanted.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chin Chee-Kai [mailto:cheekai@softml.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:52 AM
To: UBL-NDR
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema


Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are 
            otherwise the same except for documentation
            is a user-level optimisation/preference issue
            that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR.

This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative add-on, or
reading aid or optimized version (assuming 
documented version is normative).

Suggest removing it.


Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/


On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:

>>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will 
>>try to mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might 
>>duplicate it.  The membership has 5 working days to bring forth 
>>objection or discussion, after the 5 working days, if there are no 
>>objections, the rule will be assumed to be "ACCEPTED" and be given to 
>>the LCSC for their implementation.
>>
>>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>>
>>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>>
>>*******************************
>>[R 96]  Two schemas shall be developed for each standard.  One schema 
>>shall be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall 
>>be a fully annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations.
>>
>>
>>ATG Decision:  ACCEPTED.
>>
>>
>>---
>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>>