ubl-ndrsc — archive

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] import versus include schema

From: bill burcham
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:31:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] import versus include schema




From: "Burcham, Bill" <[email protected]>
To: 'Chin Chee-Kai' <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:32:47 -0500






Is the issue that the document should clearly draw a distinction between
include vs. import?  

BTW -- Mark: SSM7 is just plain wrong (thanks for pointing me to it
Chee-Kai):

A UBL root schema in one UBL namespace that is dependant upon type
definitions or element declarations defined in another namespace MUST NOT
import Schema Modules from that namespace.

That "import" should say "include".  Did we fix that already?