ubl-payfin — archive

Re: [ubl-payfin] updated payment means working draft doc

From: Kenneth Bengtsson
To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 14:03:00 -0000

Hi Levine Well done!! I ve made some minor suggestions and comments (see attached), mainly editorial (use of RFC keywords and avoiding hanging paragraphs). The only thing I stumbled upon (and sorry for not picking up on this before) is the section on payment via credit or debit card (2.3.3). In the opening text you say that the use of CardAccount under PaymentMandate is not currently supported and will be supported in future versions , and then the example shows how this would hypothetically work in future versions of UBL. However, the committee note references UBL 2.2, and how something might be used or included in future versions is speculation at this point. But why do you want to have the CardAccount ASBIE inside a PaymentMandate in the first place? Couldn t it be directly inside the PaymentMeans as it is in UBL 2.2? Could you update the date (frontpage, footer and revision history) to be the date where we will vote on the public review? So if we have it for this week then the date of the document would be Wednesday June 12. /Kenneth From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Levine Naidoo <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 7:51 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [ubl-payfin] updated payment means working draft doc Hi All kindly find attached regards Levine (See attached file: UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03.docx) Attachment: UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03 - KB comments.docx Description: UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03 - KB comments.docx