ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas

From: Eduardo Gutentag
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:13:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->



















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas




From: Eduardo Gutentag <[email protected]>
To: Stephen Green <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:14:18 -0700








On 07/19/2004 01:04 PM, Stephen Green wrote:
> Eduardo
> 
> Thanks for these comments. I thought, looking at the rule, that it should be
> changed to xmlns="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:Order:1:0"

oops, my mistake, you are right.

> or is that what it should be prior to standards approval?
> 
> Also, should we be going back to prefixing with draft numbers until we are
> sure
> we have a bug-free set of Schemas?

That would be prudent, certainly, but the moment it is presented for membership
approval it should be as ...Order:1:0

If it is rejected as a Standard by membership and a later version is subsequently
re-presented for Standard approval, the version number would or would not change
depending on whether the Schemas are touched or not.

> 
> Steve
> 
>