ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Re: Restracturing UBL spreadsheet V1.0 to V1.1

From: Yukinori Saito
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:11:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: Restracturing UBL spreadsheet V1.0 to V1.1




From: "Yukinori Saito" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:13:10 +0900






Dear Jon Bosak,
I understand your thought and proposal.
In my thought, the word 'Library' includes everything regarding UBL
contents. They are Documents, Reusable BIEs, Data Types, and Core Component
Types.
This discussion is about the field of BIEs.
Therefore, I think that the name would be better use 'BIEs' rather than
'Library'.
In the UBL TC Hangzhou meeting, the proposed names were Core BIEs, Common
Procurement BIEs, and Common Transportation BIEs. These names don't use
'Library'.
I made my proposal of UBL Library Structure based on your thought and
proposal. I attached the document in this e-mail.

Best Regards.
Yukinori Saito