[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 27 July 2005
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING
15H00 - 17H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 27 JULY 2005
ATTENDANCE
Jon Bosak (chair)
Marty Burns
Anne Hendry
Bryan Rasmussen
Zarella Rendon
Paul Thorpe
Sylvia Webb
Note that this is our last Atlantic TC call till 24 August.
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm)
None.
Liaison reports
None.
Subcommittee reports
Nothing to add to Pacific call.
Team reports
None.
Review of Pacific and Europe/Asia calls
No comments.
ACTION ITEM REVIEW
PENDING ACTION: Code list team to investigate whether it is necessary
for us to embed substition groups in code lists in order for a
customizer to extend the code lists.
Status: Still working on it.
BILLING DOCUMENTS
JB: It's essential to get a review of SG's drafts of the
two preliminary billing documents (Invoice and Credit Note):
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00150.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00151.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00158.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00159.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00160.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00161.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00162.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00163.html
SW: Have started a review; looks good so far, with the
excecption of incomplete items that SG has noted. Hope to have
review done today, then provide missing tax pieces after
Thursday's Tax XML meeting.
DISCUSSION OF CODE LISTS
JB: What needs to be settled to have the code list schema
architecture for 2.0?
MB: We just need to know if substitution groups can be
implemented without defining an abstract substitutable class.
So far we haven't been able to do this in a way that's
acceptable to Oxygen and the msxml parser. This appears to be
the only issue that needs resolution before we can create code
lists for 2.0. If we can't find an alternative, then we're
back to the proposed abstract type.
JB: So either we have a solution by the meeting in Ottawa or we
have to choose between adopting the current proposal or making
things difficult for users that need to update code lists.
BR: We use Schematron to validate the structure of CVR
(equivalent of U.S. SS number), so we wonder how useful it is
to validate attribute content against an enumeration. This
useful for elements, not so much for attributes.
MB: The goal is to have code lists usable for either attributes
or elements.
ACTION: TC to review the latest draft of the Code List Team's
discussion paper before we meet in Ottawa. Please use this PDF
version so that we're all looking at the same line numbers:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200507/msg00169.html
MB: The mornings of August 10 and 11 look best for a phone
discussion of code lists in Ottawa.
Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]