[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 22|23 August 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING
00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 23 AUGUST 2005
ATTENDANCE
Jon Bosak (chair)
Stephen Green
G. Ken Holman
Sylvia Webb
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm)
GKH: SC34 opening plenary Sat 12 November in Atlanta, colocated
with XML 2005.
Liaison report: Tax XML TC
SW: The TC meets Thursday. They are awaiting response from SG
or Tim McGrath regarding a question about our definition of tax
category:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200508/msg00072.html
AGREED that we are looking to the Tax XML TC to tell us what
the proper definition should be. This is the kind of feedback
we've been looking for.
Subcommittee report: HISC
GKH: Nothing to report this week.
SG: PeterB wants to change the order of the BIEs at the
document level but fears that this would affect HISC.
GKH: No, the sequential order doesn't matter to XPath.
Subcommittee report: SBSC
JB: The SBS 1.0 CD has been submitted to OASIS to start the
review, and it looks like we're on track to be published this
week.
GKH: Note point 1 of the input from the Tax XML TC [see URL
above]. We need to decide whether SBS should be a Standard.
SW: This is about creating guidelines...
GKH: In other words, a profile, which in the ISO world is often
standardized.
SW: The Tax XML TC is concerned because SBS 1.0 does not
include some elements that should be mandatory for tax
purposes; users could be creating records that lack important
tax information.
GKH: We can't include new elements in SBS 1.0, because those
elements are not in UBL 1.0.
SG: We have already included the additional tax elements in UBL
2.0 draft data models, so they will be included in SBS 2.0.
AGREED that we are only going as far as Committee Specification
for SBS 1.0 and will seek OASIS Standardization for SBS 2.0.
JB: Altova wants a stable version of SBS 1.0 by mid-September.
Using the CD is fine for this.
GKH: But the URNs may change as we go from CD to CS.
ACTION: JB to check RFC 3132 to see whether URNs have to change
in going from CD to CS.
Team report: Digital signatures
JB: Peter needs to set up meetings with Thomas Lee.
Review of Eurasia and Atlantic TC minutes
No meetings were held last week.
SCHEMATRON STRATEGY
JB: Please tell me again how Schematron works.
GKH: Schematron assertions (.sch) are input to XSLT along with
the Schematron stylesheet (.xsl). The output of that is
another XSLT file (.xsl), which is then run against an XML
instance to be validated, and the output of that is a report on
the original assertions.
CATALOGUE WORKSHOP
SG/SW: The work got a long way but didn't finish. TimM will
take this offline and hopes that he can soon finish the data
model, so it appears certain that we will receive a catalogue
submission. We also worked on finishing off the new phase 1
documents.
JB: That work needs to transition to the PSC now.
SW: Some people we thought would participate are not OASIS
members.
ACTION: Someone to tell Leitch and Benson that they have to
join OASIS in order to be on the PSC. [SW later took care of
this.]
SW: We need to finish the models in the next two weeks in order
to get them into the phase 1 review cycle.
SG: We cannot add new requirements at this point, and we can
only add extensions to the existing model, not restrictions.
We haven't gotten the input we need from OGC yet.
SW: All additions must be done through formal submissions to
the PSC and approved by the TC.
SG: The additions could come in during the public review, but
OGC needs to understand that they can have no assurance that
these things will be approved by the TC.
ACTION: Sylvia to arrange a PSC meeting ASAP.
SG: PeterB has taken over phase 1 spreadsheet editing as part
of PSC.
JB: My understanding is that PB is solely responsible for
editing the spreadsheets and BettyH is solely responsible for
checking them into EF.
SG: We need to make sure that every change is logged
separately, not just noted in the spreadsheets.
JB: If PB can't do this, then we will have to designate someone
to create the change log.
SG: And if we can't do that, then it would be better to log the
changes and have SG do the spreadsheet work offline. [I.e.,
not a desireable outcome, but better than having the changes
made to the spreadsheets without a separate change log.]
CONTENT WORK AND FUNCTION OF THE PACIFIC TC CALLS
AGREED that we will keep holding the Pacific TC calls (a) for
coordination purposes, (b) so that people can maintain voting
status, and (c) in the future as a venue for Q/A work. With
content work moving to the PSC and TSC, the calls should be
shorter for a while until we get to the Q/A work.
SG: Cannot attend next week.
Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]