[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 7|8 November 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING
00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 8 NOVEMBER 2005
ADMINISTRIVIA
Note that next week's Atlantic and Pacific TC calls have been
canceled due to XML 2005.
ATTENDANCE
Jon Bosak (chair)
Stephen Green
G. Ken Holman
Tim McGrath (vice chair)
Andy Schoka
Sylvia Webb
STANDING ITEMS
Liaison report: ebBP TC
SG: Agreed with the ebBP TC to include a complete example of
an ebBP instance in both the ebBP spec and the SBS, so now
making a few changes to the SBS spec.
Subcommittee report: SBSC
SG: Apart from adding the example instance, also have
comments from Monica Martin on how better to word the prose
relating to ebBP. Can these changes be made after the
coming review cycle without triggering an additional review?
JB: Safer to put them in for this review.
SG: Will make the changes over the next few days and then
forward the revised package to the TC.
Subcommittee report: PSC
TM: PB is working on the fixes required for EF processing.
SW: He intends to start Wednesday and complete ASAP.
TM: The plan is to add the catalogue content this week and
then distribute draft 8 of the models; this is the one
expected to be recommended to the TC 11/14. If we post this
to the TC list for one week signoff, we will have approved
models the week of 11/21.
JB: So we're another week behind at this point.
Subcommittee report: TSC
TM: TSC is a week behind PSC, so the TC won't get the
transport models till the week of 11/21. The good news is
that this may allow us to incorporate freight invoice,
packing list, and transport instruction.
Team report: Code Lists
GKH: See recent exchanges with TonyC on the ubl list; now
waiting for file from him. The plan is to get a scenario
working for 1.0 and them publish the files and methodology
to ubl-dev to see whether we're on the right track.
Review of Atlantic and Europe/Asia calls
Discussion: We need to understand how schema version info
gets into the versioning data item in the instance. Should
we use a fixed value specified in the schema? Does this
affect EF programming? Add to this week's NDR work session
in the Atlantic call.
Schedule review
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200511/msg00062.html
See above.
SW: Have been working with BH to set up schema generation.
ACTION ITEM REVIEW
ACTION: SG and SW to create a UBL UDT spreadsheet that
describes everything in the ATG2 UDT schema, ignoring what UBL
currently has for UDT and QDT, and then create the UBL QDT
using the same structure.
TM/SW: This item is back with SW for another draft; it does
not affect schema generation.
ACTION: SG and SW to manually update the CC parameter schema.
SW: Have given DavidK the latest draft from SG.
SG: We need to remove the minor version number from
namespaces; maybe do manually if necessary.
SW: Will talk to DavidK later tonight.
ACTION: TM to document the spreadsheet structure and format by
first week of November. This means a prose description of each
column in the spreadsheets that we are now using.
"TM: There is already a prose description in the
spreadsheets. SW was to review whether this is
appropriate."
Pending.
Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]