ubl — archive

codelist rule RE: [ubl] Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 3 May 2006

From: Stephen Green
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:22:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: codelist rule RE: [ubl] Agenda for Atlantic UBL TC call 3 May 2006




From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 08:26:38 -0600






Oops!

Should read:

...
> so then at least the 'listURI' attributes need to be  * default *
> so that these codelists can be restricted in implementations.


Quoting [email protected]:

> The thinking - was it on the Pacific call? - was that we
> want to provide genericode files even for the ATG2 codelists
> so then at least the 'listURI' attributes need to be fixed
> so that these codelists can be restricted in implementations.
> In short I think the NDR should allow both fixed and default
> and spreadsheet/modellers should specify which is used for which
> but if this had to be simplified (such as for EF) I'd say the
> simplest is to make all default and either put that in the rule
> or just in the spreadsheet. (By 'spreadsheet' I mean uDT.)
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
>
> Quoting Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> I have just been informed that I have to support a meeting @ 1300 
>> that requires travel; therefore, I will be unable to attend today's 
>> call.
>>
>>
>>>      SG: We need an agreement in this week's Atlantic call
>>>      regarding the rule about code list attributes, default
>>>      vs. fixed -- we only want default, and at the moment they
>>>      are all fixed; see emails over the last week from TM and SG.
>>>      We need to finalize this.
>>
>>
>> I have no objection to making them 'default'.
>>
>> Do we want to create two rules, one for the Code Lists we adopt from 
>> ATG 2 (these can remain fixed) and one for all others (where we 
>> allow default)?
>>
>>
>>
>>