ubl — archive

SV: [ubl] Extension

From: Sven Rasmussen
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:00:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: SV: [ubl] Extension




From: "Peter Borresen" <[email protected]>
To: "Grimley Michael J NPRI" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:58:02 +0200






Title: Extension



Yes 
you are right, The ID is of course an ID -type
 
;-) 
Peter

  -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI 
  [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 30. maj 2006 
  20:51
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: David Kruppke; 
  [email protected]; [email protected]
Emne: RE: [ubl] 
  Extension


  Peter,
   
  You seem to have an object  ('ID') with an 
  apparent property term of 'ID' defined as NameType; is this 
  correct?
   
  Thank You,
  Mike
   
  
  
  
  From: Peter Borresen 
  [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 1013
To: 
  [email protected]
Cc: David Kruppke; 
  [email protected]
Subject: [ubl] Extension


  
    
    Dear TC 
    I talked to David Kruppke from Gefeg and agreed 
    that Extension [0..1] is handled as a NDR issue - an element generated from 
    GEFEC FX in stead being specified in each document. 
    This is the definition of extension we agreed on 
    at the Brussel meeting. 
    ID [0..1] (name type)  
Name [0..1] (name type)
AgencyID [0..1] (ID 
    type)      
AgencyName 
    [0..1] (Name type)  
VersionID [0..1] (ID 
    type)     
AgencyURI [0..1] (ID 
    type)     
URI [0..1] (ID 
    type)   
ExtensionReasonCode 
    [1..1] (Code type) 
ExtensionReason [0..1] 
    (text type)     
ExtensionContentAny [1..1] (xsd: any)  

kind regards 

Peter 













[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]