ubl — archive

RE: A discussion paper on UBL modeling issues and implementation approaches

From: Juerg Tschumperlin
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:55:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: A discussion paper on UBL modeling issues and implementation approaches




From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 12 Jun 2006 20:54:30 -0000






Hi Ken,

Thank you for the good UBL 2.0 discussion paper. I am still digesting the wealth of info in it.

Allow me to ask some questions to further my understanding of your minor versioning proposal:

a) It relies on the author of a minor version xsd file to correctly retain the structure of the preceeding version, correct?

b) I can see how the proposal achieves forward and backward compatibility in a document schema. Is it also applicable to library modules CAC, CBC and QDT? Are we envisaging minor version library modules?

Regards
Juerg





Follow-Ups:

Re: [ubl] RE: A discussion paper on UBL modeling issues and implementation approaches
From: "G. Ken Holman" <[email protected]>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]