ubl — archive

Information items in 2-prd2-cd minimal instances

From: Ken Holman <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:30:00 -0000

At 2006-08-16 08:33 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote: >as it happens when trying to create sample >instances with XMLSpy i used the 'only mandatory >elements' option and got documents that looked >like your reports, then went back and added the >"out of band stuff". this proved to me that the >out of band stuff is sufficiently different for >each implementation (and instance) to make it impossible to standardize. > >its true it wasn't an exhaustive test but in my >mind we are close enough to the 80/20 line on this. Excellent ... thanks for this feedback. If you feel that what is there now is still workable with out-of-band additions, then I'm confident the issue has been addressed enough that we can continue with discussing the appropriateness of the "using out-of-band stuff" idea with the models as they stand. Thanks, Tim, for investing the time to think about this. . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- UBL/XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training: Vårø, Denmark 06-09-25/10-06 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training. G. Ken Holman mailto:[email protected] Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal