ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Including code list schemas in the UBL package

From: Jon Bosak
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:47:00 -0000

I received this message after the Atlantic call began and therefore didn't see it until the call had ended. > It has been suggested to me off-list [...] Which means that we have no formal responsibility to recognize this as an issue. So I'm treating this as a question from Ken. | Summary: | | (1) - should the UBL 2.0 delivery include copies of the genericode | XSD files? | | (2) - should the UBL 2.0 genericode files point | to these XSD files using xsi:schemaLocation with a relative URL? | | My answers are: (1) - yes, and (2) - no. I completely agree with (2), but I would say No to (1). While this has no substantive impact on the specification, I can't see any good reason to put yet more stuff into the release. It just means more to confuse people and more to document. At the least, people are going to assume that the added files are normative in some sense, which isn't true at this point even for genericode. Weren't we going to include the genericode xsd files in the Support Package anyway? Jon Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:27:46 -0400 From: "G. Ken Holman"