[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Sanity check for models dated 20100618-2010z
The next issue I find is with the schemas ... here is an excerpt from
UBL-CommonAggregateComponents-2.1.xsd:
<xsd:element name="TransportAdvisorParty" type="PartyType"/>
<xsd:element name="TransportContract" type="TransportContractType"/>
<xsd:element name="TransportContract" type="ContractType"/>
<xsd:element name="TransportEquipment" type="TransportEquipmentType"/>
... and note the two declarations for "TransportContract" (of course
there can only be one).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
At 2010-06-19 07:51 -0400, I wrote:
>At 2010-06-15 18:34 +0200, Arianna Brutti wrote:
>>I have completed my tasks.
>>
>>I have some doubts about two tasks, but this morning I asked Tim a
>>clarification about. If some changes concerning this will be
>>needed, I will be able to make them later.
>>
>>So, if you agree, I think that we have reached a good point to try
>>to generate a new snapshot of draft UBL 2.1 models and to
>>automatically check if all problems related to DEN, data type
>>qualification, ... have been resolved.
>
>Thank you for your efforts Arianna!
>
>Please find below my latest analysis, this one from
>20100618-2010z. Note that the old missing data type qualification
>is *not* an error ... this is acceptable. All such are being
>reported in case there are others that are missed, but this one was
>a conscious decision.
>
>. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]