Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 5/6] VIRTIO-63: Make sure examples are marked clearly.

[Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>]

Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:

> On Mon,  3 Mar 2014 15:31:32 +1030
> Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  content.tex | 17 ++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>> index f3899b6..a11525b 100644
>> --- a/content.tex
>> +++ b/content.tex
>> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ result.
>> 
>>  The mechanism for bulk data transport on virtio devices is
>>  pretentiously called a virtqueue. Each device can have zero or more
>> -virtqueues: for example, the simplest network device has one for
>> -transmit and one for receive.  Each queue has a 16-bit queue size
>> +virtqueues\footnote{For example, the simplest network device has one for
>
> I'd make that "has one _virtqueue_ for transmit" - this is probably
> clearer as the footnote lacks the immediate context.

Agreed, thanks.

>> 
>>  As a device can have zero or more virtqueues for bulk data
>> -transport (for example, the simplest network device has two), the driver
>> +transport,\footnote{For example, the simplest network device has two} the driver
>
> Similarily, I'd write "two virtqueues" here.

Indeed.  Fixed.

Thanks,
Rusty.