[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-snd: add support for audio controls
On Tue, Apr 20 2021, Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com> wrote:
> This patch extends the virtio sound device specification by adding
> support for audio controls. Audio controls can be used to set the volume
> level, mute/unmute the audio signal, switch different modes/states of
> the virtual sound device, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com>
> ---
> conformance.tex | 5 +
> virtio-sound.tex | 374 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> @@ -50,6 +53,7 @@ \subsection{Device Configuration Layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device /
> le32 jacks;
> le32 streams;
> le32 chmaps;
> + le32 controls;
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> @@ -62,6 +66,9 @@ \subsection{Device Configuration Layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device /
> PCM streams.
> \item[\field{chmaps}] (driver-read-only) indicates a total number of all available
> channel maps.
> +\item[\field{controls}] (driver-read-only) indicates a total number of all available
> +control elements if VIRTIO_SND_F_CTLS has been negotiated.
While the driver is not supposed to read this if the feature has not
been negotiated, do we also want to add a normative statement about what
the device is supposed to do in this case? Does the field always exist?
> +
> \end{description}
>
> \subsection{Device Initialization}
Does anyone familiar with virtio-snd want to take a look at this update?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]