Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] packed-ring.tex: link conformance statements

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Apr 19 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> Link conformance statements into conformance chapter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>  conformance.tex |  9 +++++++++
>  packed-ring.tex | 16 +++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex
> index 9807c30..663e7c3 100644
> --- a/conformance.tex
> +++ b/conformance.tex
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating idx}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Notifying The Device}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}

I wonder whether we could use the opportunity to fix that "PAcked" typo
here as well.

> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table / Indirect Descriptors}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating flags}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Sending Available Buffer Notifications}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Initialization}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Cleanup}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:Reserved Feature Bits}
> @@ -340,6 +346,9 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Used Buffer Notification Suppression}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Used Ring}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression}
> +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues}
> +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}
> +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Shared Memory Regions}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Reserved Feature Bits}
>  \end{itemize}

I guess it is ok to link this up as an editorial update; the statements
are pre-existing, and an implementation that does not know the feature
bit remains compliant.