Re: [virtio] [PATCH 2/5] feedback: drop use of "we"

[Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>]

Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:

> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:10:23 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> explicitly say driver/device or use passive form
>> as appropriate.
>> 
>> Cc: Arun Subbarao <asubbarao@lnxw.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  content.tex | 18 ++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>
>> @@ -663,12 +664,12 @@ device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
>>  \subsubsection{Updating The Index Field}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Operation / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating The Index Field}
>> 
>>  Once the index field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will
>> -be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the
>> +be able to access the descriptor chains that driver created and the
>
> s/driver/the driver/ ?
>
> (also in various places below)

Yes, by my count there are four.  With that changed:

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Thanks,
Rusty.